*3.6-Makkos Daf 03 B (21 Lines Dn)*

*3.6-Makkos Daf 03 B (21 Lines Dn)**Summary**Rav Yehuda amar Shmuel:* If A lends B money *on condition that _Shevi’is_ does not nullify the loan.*_Shevi’is_ *does* in fact nullify the loan.*It would seem:* Shmuel is of the opinion that _masneh al mah shekasuv batorah tna’o bateil_ - A condition that is *against the Torah is not a condition.**Challenge:**Itmar* (We learned): If A makes a sale to B *on condition that he cannot complain of ona’ah* (deceptive pricing).*Rav:* There is _ona’ah._*Shmuel:* There is *no _ona’ah._*(Shmuel is of the opinion that one can yield his Torah-rights. But in the case of _shevi’is_ he holds that the one cannot yield?).*Resolution:**Rav Anan* explained the opinion of Shmuel as heard from *Shmuel* himself: In a case where A said “On condition that *you don’t hold _ona’ah_* against me”, then there is *no _ona’ah._*But if he said “On condition that *there is no _ona’ah_ ”* his condition cannot be effective, because there *is* in fact a _din_ of _ona’ah_ in the Torah.The same holds true for _shevi’is_ : If A said “On condition that *you don’t nullify the loan* when _shevi’is_ comes”, the loan would not be nullified.But if he said “On condition that *_shevi’is_ does not nullify the loan”,* _shevi’is_ *does* nullify the loan. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.