![Science for Policy artwork](https://is3-ssl.mzstatic.com/image/thumb/Podcasts114/v4/06/25/62/06256283-819b-848e-600e-0c8b31dd0328/mza_16498369945510066417.png/100x100bb.jpg)
Matthew Flinders on science, political accountability and blame
Science for Policy
English - February 14, 2022 05:45 - 43 minutes - 64 MBScience Homepage Download Apple Podcasts Google Podcasts Overcast Castro Pocket Casts RSS feed
Previous Episode: Silvio Funtowicz on post-normal science advice
Next Episode: Diana Ürge-Vorsatz on what makes the IPCC tick
Combative debate, accusations and blame are often seen as legitimate tools in the toolbox of partisan political debate. Now, in the new world of high-profile science advisors stepping (or being dragged) into the political limelight, should they be held to the same standards of accountability as their political colleagues?
Two years on from the start of the pandemic, an era of public enquiries is beginning, and Professor Matthew Flinders has something to say about the dangers scientists face — and what practical skills they might need if they want to survive in the shark tank.