Previous Episode: Trolls, Troglodytes & Spooks
Next Episode: Happy Halloweiners!

DESCRIPTION

In this episode, we make a defense of the non-aggression principle by taking apart an article published at Libertarianism.org entitled 'Six Reasons Libertarians Should Reject the Non-Aggression Principle'.  Is the NAP an infallible ideology?  Are there fatal flaws in its core?  Or are the critiques merely pedantic complaints?  Let's take a look!

CERVEZA OF THE WEEK

Six Mile Bridge Brewing Rate Beer: Six Mile Bridge Double-Hopped IPA

TROLL OR TROGLODYTE TWEETS

“I held an AR-15 in my hand, I wish I hadn’t. It is as heavy as 10 boxes that you might be moving. And the bullet that is utilized, a .50 caliber, these kinds of bullets need to be licensed and do not need to be on the street.” - Rep. @JacksonLeeTX18 pic.twitter.com/U71ir6BHZH

— Jason Howerton (@jason_howerton) September 23, 2019

I think women’s suffrage was a mistake. As unpopular as it is to say it, women think and therefore vote differently than men. I don’t think the fruits have been good. Furthermore, it’s an unproven assumption that lacking franchise somehow assaults human dignity for either sex. https://t.co/4hctsIbO6G

— Stefanie Nicholas ☩ (@StefMNicholas) September 10, 2019

SHOW NOTES

Six Reasons Libertarians Should Reject the Non-Aggression Principle

Twitter Mentions