Episode 24: Uber v Heller PART III

Welcome to the third installation of our recording of Uber v Heller! We've saved the spiciest for last with Justice Cote's strong dissent which discusses both public interest and unconscionability. To listen to the majority opinion (and for Z + K's take on the case), head back to Episode 22. To hear the concurring opinion of Brown J, head on over to Episode 23. #AudioObiter  

Legal Listening - Where Audio Obiter is Our Thing!

Link to decision: https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/2020/2020scc16/2020scc16.html?searchUrlHash=AAAAAQATdWJlciB2IGhlbGxlciAgMjAyMAAAAAAB&resultIndex=1

Check us out at legallistening.com, look for us on CanLii connects, find us on twitter @legallistening or email us at [email protected]

While you're here, check out our team!

Julie Lundy: https://www.julielundyart.com/

Rad & Kel: https://www.radandkell.com/

Remember we're always looking for guest readers to come on the podcast. Have a decision you love? Want to see it recorded? Reach out!