BONUS: Rio Tinto Alcan Inc. v. Carrier Sekani Tribal Council #BCITCollab

Welcome back to the C O L L A B ZONE!

Today we continue our new series of bonus episodes which we recorded with the help of students from the British Columbia Institute of Technology!

As part of our ongoing engagement with Call to Action #27 of the TRC, we created a series of summaries of key Aboriginal case law decisions so that legal students, practitioners, and the public can further engage and learn about how our Canadian legal system treats Indigenous peoples. Some of these decisions are already available in full in other episodes, others we are still working on releasing as full recordings. We worked on this project with students from the British Columbia Institute of Technology, who generously donated their time to record the summaries for us. We also want to thank the 1492 Windsor Law Coalition who provided the basis for some summaries.

Today we have Rio Tinto Alcan Inc. v. Carrier Sekani Tribal Council a 2010 SCC decision. The SCC reaffirmed the test from Haida for the Duty to Consult and held that approving the Energy Purchase Agreement in question was not unreasonable as it did not adversely affect an Aboriginal Interest. 

Link to the full decision: https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/2010/2010scc43/2010scc43.html?autocompleteStr=Rio%20Tinto%20scc&autocompletePos=1

Legal Listening - Where Audio Obiter is Our Thing!

We're now on Patreon! Become a patron, unlock fun bonus content, and support the project here: patreon.com/LegalListening 

Check us out at legallistening.com, look for us on CanLii Connects, find us on twitter @legallistening or email us at [email protected]

While you're here, check out our team!

Julie Lundy: https://www.julielundyart.com/

Rad & Kel: https://www.radandkell.com/

Remember we're always looking for guest readers to come on the podcast. Have a decision you love? Want to see it recorded? Reach out!