Session 7: Interrogations, Confessions, and Miranda Rights

Introduction to Interrogations and Constitutional Foundations:

Interrogations form a critical phase of criminal investigations, raising significant constitutional considerations. This section initiates the discussion by exploring the historical context of interrogations and their constitutional foundations. We'll delve into the Fifth Amendment, which protects individuals from self-incrimination, laying the groundwork for understanding the delicate balance between law enforcement's need for information and an individual's right to remain silent.

Miranda v Arizona and the Right to Remain Silent:

Miranda v Arizona (1966) stands as a landmark case that solidified the right to remain silent during police interrogations. We'll dissect the Miranda decision, examining the court's rationale and the establishment of the famous Miranda warnings. This foundational right ensures that individuals are aware of their constitutional protections and can choose to exercise their right to remain silent without adverse consequences.

Custodial Interrogations and Threshold for Miranda:

A crucial aspect of Miranda rights is their application during custodial interrogations. We'll explore the distinction between custodial and non-custodial situations and discuss the threshold at which Miranda rights are triggered. Understanding when law enforcement must advise individuals of their rights is essential for evaluating the admissibility of statements obtained during interrogations.

Invoking and Waiving Miranda Rights:

Once Miranda rights are given, individuals have the choice to either invoke or waive them. This segment examines the practical implications of invoking the right to remain silent or requesting legal counsel. We'll explore the nuances of waiver, emphasizing the importance of voluntariness and a knowing and intelligent relinquishment of Miranda rights.

Exceptions to Miranda:

While Miranda provides crucial protections, there are exceptions that allow law enforcement to proceed with questioning without explicitly issuing Miranda warnings. This section will discuss scenarios where exceptions apply, such as public safety exceptions and routine booking questions. Understanding these exceptions is vital for grasping the scope of Miranda protections in various situations.

Confessions and the Voluntariness Standard:

Confessions are powerful pieces of evidence, but their admissibility hinges on voluntariness. We'll delve into the voluntariness standard, examining how courts assess the circumstances surrounding confessions. Cases like Brown v Mississippi (1936) and Culombe v Connecticut (1961) provide insights into the constitutional requirements for a confession to be considered voluntary.

Electronic Recording of Interrogations:

The increasing use of technology in law enforcement has led to discussions about the benefits of electronically recording interrogations. We'll explore the advantages and challenges associated with recording interrogations, analyzing how this practice aligns with constitutional principles and enhances transparency in the criminal justice system.

Global Perspectives on Interrogations and Human Rights:

Interrogation practices vary globally, and this part of the session provides a comparative analysis of how different legal systems address interrogations and confessions. We'll touch on international human rights standards and conventions that influence the treatment of individuals during interrogations, contributing to a broader understanding of the global landscape.

---

Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message
Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support