#23: Is a sequestered jury's fear of not being fed an adverse influence on their deliberations?

Juror Misconduct Law in Review

English - June 22, 2019 18:59 - 15 minutes - 16 MB - ★★★★★ - 5 ratings
Careers Business Education Courses jurormisconduct Homepage Download Apple Podcasts Google Podcasts Overcast Castro Pocket Casts RSS feed

Previous Episode: #22: Is a post-verdict evidentiary hearing required to determine a juror's competency due to admitted memory lapses during trial?

Next Episode: #24: Exploring the relationship between the juror and the trial witness

State v. Kaiser, No. A17-0571, 2018 WL 2407187 (Minn. Ct. App. May 29, 2018).

Summary: Nilgün Aykent Zahour analyzes the juror misconduct issues in State v. Kaiser, No. A17-0571, 2018 WL 2407187 (Minn. Ct. App. May 29, 2018). The issue we’re going to discuss is whether a sequestered jury’s fear of not being fed adversely influenced or pressured them in their deliberations.