![Good in Theory: A Political Philosophy Podcast artwork](https://is1-ssl.mzstatic.com/image/thumb/Podcasts113/v4/d6/be/fb/d6befb49-dd6f-1bbd-8d20-ff2dc2469f41/mza_3245237120381192827.jpeg/100x100bb.jpg)
36 - Moral Saints 2: Why Be a Saint?
Good in Theory: A Political Philosophy Podcast
English - October 12, 2021 13:00 - 33 minutes - 23.1 MBPhilosophy Society & Culture Education philosophy political theory history politics plato political philosophy aristotle history of ideas political thought theory Homepage Download Google Podcasts Overcast Castro Pocket Casts RSS feed
This episode is about Wolf’s “Moral Saints,” Peter Singer’s “Famine, Affluence and Morality,” and Larissa Macfarquhar’s Strangers Drowning.
Susan Wolf thinks that devoting your life to helping others would be a real drag. It’d interfere with playing tennis and reading Tolstoy.
True enough but some people might have philosophical and personal reasons to do it anyway.
For example, Peter Singer argues that, if you think a child’s life is worth more than your shoes, then you’re morally obliged to give away all your money to charity.
Larissa Macfarquhar helps out with the personal reasons. She’s written a book that profiles a whole bunch of real-life do-gooders. And it turns out that even though the saintly life is tough, the saints are getting something out of it. And from their perspective, a life of Tolstoy and tennis might not be a great as Wolf makes it out to be.
References
Macfarquhar, Strangers Drowning
Singer, “Famine, Affluence, and Morality”
Wolf, “Moral Saints”