Cannibalism, Nazism and property rights

 

Welcome to Part Two:

Let’s look at these claims:

Means of production owned by the public or state This removed property rights – Which is the foundation of wealth accumulation Think of a group assignment – social loafing Property rights lead to incentives Zimbabwe – Took property rights away – expropriated land and property rights China – Introduced property rights – Incentivised farmers – reduced starvation Australia – Same thing – gave the convicts rights – as was only way to get them to work – Joke: ‘pretend to pay us, so we pretend to work’ Equal opportunity for all I have an issue with this – it is equal outcome for all, NOT equal opportunity (unless zero) The outcome is nobody can get ahead, so they have zero opportunity You want to start a business? You can’t! You want to buy a house? You can’t! You want to save for yourself? Well, you don’t get paid…and the government can take all your savings anyway Economic activity and productions are planned by central planning There is no feedback system here – so no recourse for when things go wrong State gets it wrong – tough luck Free market gets it wrong – that person goes out of business and someone else prospers New Coke – That was a decision that was corrected quickly due to feedback from the market Forced Labour Uzbekistan – Cotton industry – Millions of people a year are forced to work on cotton fields – Doctors, teachers, businessmen Not just adults - Children aged 11-15 in September – Forced to Price Controls = Mass starvation Creates shortages as no incentives to create more Example – you are a farmer – it costs you $10 to produce a bag of apples, BUT the Government will only allow you to sell the bag for $5… will you continue to work for a $5 loss?

John Oliver – Venezuela

No facts – Funny guy, but he kept saying “if only”, “If only” the oil prices kept going up, “if only” Chávez had stayed alive... He forgot one “if” – if only they hadn’t destroyed the most productive oil company through having the government take control ‘Epic mismanagement’ – that is inevitable in a socialist society – free market isn’t Give all the power to the top to control – the workers don’t make decisions Socialism leads to lower inequality Sadly, again not true Creates higher inequality as power is centralised – no free market or ability to improve yourself And at the same time – wealth plummets and poverty sets in for the masses. No middle classes here – simply poverty and ultra-wealthy (the State)

 

Heaven and hell

I’m not religious, but I do believe in Heaven and hell – Look at some parts of the world – they are living in hell!

Examples of Socialism/Communism implemented faithfully – Starvations and killings

China – Mao – 61 million – Starvation lead to cannibalism in both Russia – 45 million North Korea – Forced labour camps – mass starvation Germany – Hitler was a socialist – Nazi = National Socialist German Workers’ Party Unemployed promised work and bread Today: Venezuela – population has lost average of 19kg in weight per individual since Maduro took over Capitalism – I guess is responsible for deaths as well – Obesity and smoking – but it’s the individuals choice at least! Unless you are Bernie Sanders – ‘bread lines are a good thing’

The unfortunate thing  

It does work in the short term (social proof) – but then stagnates as there is no incentive for further growth

Venezuela - Poverty halved in the beginning due to taking all of privately owned business and giving it away – how did that work out? Oil rich having largest reserves in the world – but no means of getting it out of the ground – They have to import it Price controls and creating more money – that is what happens when State gets their hands-on the money supply

Print, print, print = Hyperinflation and no ability to transact!

Socialists are Hypocrites!

Stating that there is “discrimination”, but now they engage in it with socially engineered policies which discriminates against those who have something To get the outcomes they want, they discriminate against the rich through taxes

Socialism works from manipulating the masses – take from those who, unfortunately, are the productive ones (hence why they have the wealth in the first place)

Two fish

Sail fish – fastest fish – over 100km per hour – if in a pond that dries up, it will die Sea Horse – Less than 1/100th of a kilometre per hour in a large ocean prospers Destroys society – nobody can swim faster than the pack

Compared to Capitalism

Capitalism affords economic freedom, consumer choice, and economic growth. 

Socialism, which is an economy controlled by the state and planned by a central planning authority, provides for a greater social welfare … As Thatcher famously and correctly said, "The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money."

Thanks for listening…

Next Friday’s episode – we’ll look at why free markets lead to a better life for you and how to build wealth within that system.