Shevuot 34: Why oaths of testimony apply solely in monetary cases

Daf Yomi - Rabbi Eli Yoggev, Beth Tfiloh Congregation

English - January 01, 2018 12:30 - 1 hour - 57.3 MB - ★★★★★ - 3 ratings
Judaism Religion & Spirituality Education daf yomi beth tfiloh yoggev Homepage Download Apple Podcasts Google Podcasts Overcast Castro Pocket Casts RSS feed

Previous Episode: Shevuot 33: Do penalties incur liability for oaths of testimony?

Next Episode: Shevuot 35: Names of God: Oaths, definition, placement in Torah

Braita with four Tannaitic opinions on why oaths of testimony apply solely to monetary cases (33b-34a); 2) R' Eliezer's approach: highlighting the similarities between oaths of testimony and oaths of deposit (34a); 3) R' Akiva: not fundamentally disagreeing with R' Eliezer (34a); 4) R' Yosi Haglili: Why we allow the most circumstantial evidence for monetary cases (34a); 5) Two cases of impartial testimony (34a-34b).

Click here to read the source sheet

Click here for the board layout

Rabbi Eli Yoggev can be reached for questions and comments at [email protected].