![Legale§e artwork](https://is3-ssl.mzstatic.com/image/thumb/Podcasts125/v4/0f/72/cb/0f72cb25-8c66-0cd0-63f8-2b76e4036927/mza_11620165472338165177.jpg/100x100bb.jpg)
Does Money Equal Speech
Legale§e
English - January 31, 2022 04:56 - 32 minutes - 22.4 MBGovernment Homepage Download Apple Podcasts Google Podcasts Overcast Castro Pocket Casts RSS feed
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/EdWApA0q93U" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Today on Categorical Imperatives we have a new video in my "Today In Supreme Court History" series. This weeks marks the 12 year anniversary of the Supreme Court's opinion in the case of Citizen's United v Federal Election Commission. So I have briefed three landmark Supreme Court cases concerning the relationship between money and speech as a matter of law. We will be starting with:
Buckley v Valeo, 424 U.S. 1 (1976)
which set the precedent upon which the second case is constructed:
McConnell v F.E.C. 540 U.S. 93 (2003)
which is the case Citizens United overturned:
Citizens United v F.E.C. 558 U.S. 310 (2010)
Citizens United and Twelve Years of Unjustified Resentment
---
Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/legaleseshow/support