Smith v. Arizona, No. 22-899 [Arg: 1.10.2024]
Supreme Court of the United States
English - January 12, 2024 17:51 - 1 hour - 40.7 MB - ★★★★★ - 2 ratingsPolitics News justice supreme court usa united states docket Homepage Download Apple Podcasts Google Podcasts Overcast Castro Pocket Casts RSS feed
Previous Episode: Office of the U.S. Trustee v. John Q. Hammons Fall 2006, LLC, No. 22-1238 [Arg: 1.9.2024]
Next Episode: Devillier v. Texas, No. 22-913 [Arg: 1.16.2024]
Issue(s): Whether the confrontation clause of the Sixth Amendment permits the prosecution in a criminal trial to present testimony by a substitute expert conveying the testimonial statements of a nontestifying forensic analyst, on the grounds that (a) the testifying expert offers some independent opinion and the analyst’s statements are offered not for their truth but to explain the expert’s opinion, and (b) the defendant did not independently seek to subpoena the analyst.