![Supreme Court of the United States artwork](https://is5-ssl.mzstatic.com/image/thumb/Podcasts113/v4/c5/5f/d6/c55fd63b-d5d9-1158-7d2d-1c1b0e2fd24a/mza_11383548006177352583.jpg/100x100bb.jpg)
20-637 HEMPHILL V. NEW YORK (2021-OCT-05)
Supreme Court of the United States
English - October 07, 2021 16:13 - 1 hour - 32.2 MB - ★★★★★ - 2 ratingsPolitics News justice supreme court usa united states docket Homepage Download Apple Podcasts Google Podcasts Overcast Castro Pocket Casts RSS feed
Previous Episode: 20-826 BROWN V. DAVENPORT (2021-OCT-05)
Next Episode: 20-827 UNITED STATES V. ZUBAYDAH (2021-OCT-06)
QUESTION PRESENTED:
A litigant’s argumentation or introduction of evidence at trial is often deemed to “open the door” to the admission of responsive evidence that would otherwise be barred by the rules of evidence.
The question presented is: Whether, or under what circumstances, a criminal defendant who opens the door to responsive evidence also forfeits his right to exclude evidence otherwise barred by the Confrontation Clause.