050. Romance Myths Busted Part 2 with Tamara Lush, Charish Reid, Megan Erickson, Rosie Danan

Shelf Love: Romance Novel Discourse

English - July 07, 2020 04:00 - 29 minutes - 27.1 MB - ★★★★★ - 54 ratings
Books Arts academic discussions feminism intersectional feminist literary criticism fiction romance books romance novels romantic fiction storytelling romantic love Homepage Download Apple Podcasts Google Podcasts Overcast Castro Pocket Casts RSS feed

Previous Episode: 049. Blind Date With A Book Boyfriend by Lucy Eden with Katrina Jackson

Next Episode: 051. The Rakess by Scarlett Peckham with Hannah Hearts Romance

Part 2! Romance novel authors and readers bust just some of the myths and misunderstandings about romance novels. Are romance novels easy to write, vapid, mommy porn? Um, no. If you’ve ever heard this podcast, definitely no. But listen on for responses from Tamara Lush, Charish Reid, Megan Erickson, and Rosie Danan.

Shelf Love:

Sign up for the email newsletter list | Website | Twitter | Instagram | Goodreads | Email: [email protected]58 Romance Novellas For A Quick Hit of Hope 15 Romance Novel Audiobooks that Combine Swoony Words with Great Performances Check out Shelf Love’s updated website including the transcript for this episode

More Myths episodes:

Myths and Misconceptions part 1 (Myths 1-5)Myth 6: Bree from Kit Rocha busts “They’re all the same.”Myth 7: EE Ottoman busts “They’re by women, for women.”Myth 8: Adriana Herrera busts “Feminists don’t read romance.”

The thread that started it all: Myths Twitter Thread from 12/11/19

Myth 9: They’re easy to write and anyone can do it because there’s a formula
Myth Buster: Tamara Lush

Tamara Lush:

Website | Twitter | Instagram | Constant Craving on Wattpad

Myth 10: They’re unrealistic and vapid
Myth Buster: Charish Reid

Myth contributed by JL Peridot.

Charish Reid:

Instagram | Twitter | Website | The Write Escape