Episode 121: Preventing Groupthink
Keep Moving Forward
English - May 10, 2022 00:00 - 35 minutes - 31.6 MB - ★★★★★ - 3 ratingsChristianity Religion & Spirituality revitalization church new replanting england religion & spirituality christianity boston Homepage Download Apple Podcasts Google Podcasts Overcast Castro Pocket Casts RSS feed
Previous Episode: Episode 120: The Causes of Groupthink
Next Episode: Episode 122: Fasting and Praying!! Natalie is back!!!!
As observed by Aldag and Fuller (1993), the groupthink phenomenon seems to rest on a set of unstated and generally restrictive assumptions:
The purpose of group problem solving is mainly to improve decision quality
Group problem solving is considered a rational process.
Benefits of group problem solving:
variety of perspectives
more information about possible alternatives
better decision reliability
dampening of biases
social presence effects
Groupthink prevents these benefits due to structural faults and provocative situational context.
Groupthink prevention methods will produce better decisions
An illusion of well-being is presumed to be inherently dysfunctional.
Group pressures towards consensus lead to concurrence-seeking tendencies.
According to Janis, decision-making groups are not necessarily destined to groupthink. He devised ways of preventing groupthink:
Leaders should assign each member the role of "critical evaluator." This allows each member to freely air objections and doubts.
Leaders should not express an opinion when assigning a task to a group.
Leaders should absent themselves from many group meetings to avoid excessively influencing the outcome.
The organization should set up several independent groups working on the same problem.
All effective alternatives should be examined.
Each member should discuss the group's ideas with trusted people outside of the group.
The group should invite outside experts into meetings. Group members should be allowed to discuss with and question the outside experts.
At least one group member should be assigned the role of devil's advocate. This should be a different person for each meeting.