![Patterson in Pursuit artwork](https://is2-ssl.mzstatic.com/image/thumb/Podcasts123/v4/3b/cf/8f/3bcf8fbc-0069-e85e-ba60-5102a60879b0/mza_5957882068404523449.png/100x100bb.jpg)
Ep. 63 - The Limits of the Non-Aggression Principle | Interview Breakdown
Patterson in Pursuit
English - June 25, 2017 09:30 - 30 minutes - 20.6 MB - ★★★★ - 105 ratingsPhilosophy Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality god islam libertarian mathematics religion science skeptic anarchism anarchist atheism Homepage Download Apple Podcasts Google Podcasts Overcast Castro Pocket Casts RSS feed
Previous Episode: Language is Inherently Ambiguous
Next Episode: Can Drugs Lead to Truth?
Are there exceptions to the so-called "non-aggression principle," which says that it is never justified to initiate force against a peaceful person?
In some circumstances, could it be justified to use physical force on somebody that doesn't consent? What qualifies as "consent" in the first place?
This is part 1 of my breakdown of Episode 50 - my conversation with Stephan Kinsella. In the future, I'll release a second breakdown of our conversation about argumentation ethics.
Get full access to Steve Patterson's Substack at stevepatterson.substack.com/subscribe