Oral Arguments of the Supreme Court of Virginia artwork

February 2020 Green v. Diagnostic Imaging Associates, et al.

Oral Arguments of the Supreme Court of Virginia

English - March 11, 2020 12:52 - 33 minutes - 23.2 MB - ★★★★★ - 5 ratings
Government News supremecourt virginia benglass benglasslaw lawyer legal legaltraining oralargument oralarguments supremecourtofvirginia Homepage Download Apple Podcasts Google Podcasts Overcast Castro Pocket Casts RSS feed


This podcast is provided by Ben Glass and Steve Emmert

www.BenGlassReferrals.com - www.Virginia-Appeals.com

Granted Appeal Summary

Case

LEWIS DARNELL GREEN, PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE/EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF ONEIDA STILTNER GREEN, DECEASED v. DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING ASSOCIATES, P.C., ET AL. (Record Number 190181)

From

The Circuit Court of Tazewell County; R. Patterson, Judge.

Counsel

M. Bryan Slaughter and E. Kyle McNew (MichieHamlett PLLC) for appellant.

John T. Jessee, Joseph M. Rainsbury, and Sarah C. Jessee (LeClairRyan); Frank K. Friedman, Elizabeth Guilbert Perrow, Daniel T. Sarrell, Erin B. Ashwell, and J. Walton Milam III (Woods Rogers PLC); and C.J. Steuart Thomas, III and Noelle Quam (TimberlakeSmith) for appellees.

Assignments of Error


1. The circuit court erred in granting the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. The court granted the Motion by Letter Opinion dated September 20, 2018, which was incorporated by reference into the final order, styled “Order Granting Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss,” entered November 15, 2018.


2. The circuit court erred in finding that Plaintiff’s claim was barred by Virginia Code § 8.01-56. The court made this finding at pages 5 through 6 of the Letter Opinion dated September 20, 2018, which was incorporated by reference into the final order, styled “Order Granting Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss,” entered November 15, 2018.


3. The circuit court erred in finding that the Plaintiff’s settlement of the Kentucky case equated to an election of remedy under Virginia law. The court made this finding at page 6 of the Letter Opinion dated September 20, 2018, which was incorporated by reference into the final order, styled “Order Granting Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss,” entered November 15, 2018.


4. The circuit court erred in finding that Plaintiff’s claim was barred by judicial estoppel. The court made this finding at page 6 of the Letter Opinion dated September 20, 2018, which was incorporated by reference into the final order, styled “Order Granting Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss,” entered November 15, 2018.

www.courts.state.va.us/courts/scv/appeals/190181.pdf

This podcast is brought to you by Virginia Injury and Disability law firm, Ben Glass Law.

Real legal help for real people

Your life has been disrupted. You have good doctors and they support you. Your personal injury or long-term disability claim seems like a slam dunk. But there’s a problem: The insurance company doesn’t believe you. “You can’t be hurt that bad! Our medical experts say you’re fine.”

You need a trusted advocate who can uncover all the facts, tell your story to the skeptical insurance company, and get you the money you deserve. You don’t have to do this alone. Contact our Virginia personal injury and long-term disability lawyers today for a free consultation or denial letter review.

Get a free consultation