February 2020 Caldwell v. Commonwealth.
Oral Arguments of the Supreme Court of Virginia
English - April 06, 2020 14:46 - 34 minutes - 23.7 MB - ★★★★★ - 5 ratingsGovernment News supremecourt virginia benglass benglasslaw lawyer legal legaltraining oralargument oralarguments supremecourtofvirginia Homepage Download Apple Podcasts Google Podcasts Overcast Castro Pocket Casts RSS feed
This podcast is provided by Ben Glass and Steve Emmert
www.BenGlassReferrals.com - www.Virginia-Appeals.com
Granted Appeal Summary
Case
CANDACE RENE CALDWELL v. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA (Record Number 190541)
From
The Court of Appeals of Virginia.
Counsel
Rick Boyer (Integrity Law Firm, PLLC) for appellant.
Tiffany J. Bennett (Office of the Commonwealth’s Attorney) for appellee.
Assignment of Error
The trial court improperly convicted Caldwell of defrauding an innkeeper by obtaining food with intent not to pay therefor, in violation of Code of Virginia 18.2-188. Code of Virginia § 18.2-188 requires that a defendant have the intent to defraud when the benefit is obtained. The Court stated that even if Caldwell did not have the intent to defraud when she obtained the benefit, when she was later asked to pay and refused, she formed the intent to defraud, and convicted Caldwell. The Court did not find that Caldwell possessed the requisite intent at the time she obtained the benefit, as required by the statute. Accordingly, Caldwell’s conviction is improper and should be overturned.
There was no transcript made of the trial, and no mention was made in the parties’ initial Statement of Facts in Lieu of Transcript that the objection was specifically preserved at trial. However, the Court of Appeals found that there was sufficient evidence in the record to determine that Caldwell’s objection was preserved by her counsel at trial. Caldwell argues that, given the trial court’s error of law, the ends of justice militate in favor of this Court’s granting her appeal despite the lack of a record in the initial Statement of Facts indicating that the objection was specifically preserved by her trial counsel.
The Court of Appeals erred in not finding that the judge’s clearly erroneous statement of law did not constitute reversible error.
http://www.courts.state.va.us/courts/scv/appeals/190541.pdf
This podcast is brought to you by Virginia Injury and Disability law firm, Ben Glass Law.
Real legal help for real people
Your life has been disrupted. You have good doctors and they support you. Your personal injury or long-term disability claim seems like a slam dunk. But there’s a problem: The insurance company doesn’t believe you. “You can’t be hurt that bad! Our medical experts say you’re fine.”
You need a trusted advocate who can uncover all the facts, tell your story to the skeptical insurance company, and get you the money you deserve. You don’t have to do this alone. Contact our Virginia personal injury and long-term disability lawyers today for a free consultation or denial letter review.