April 2020 Sosebee, et al. v. Franklin County School Board
Oral Arguments of the Supreme Court of Virginia
English - May 06, 2020 16:29 - 33 minutes - 22.9 MB - ★★★★★ - 5 ratingsGovernment News supremecourt virginia benglass benglasslaw lawyer legal legaltraining oralargument oralarguments supremecourtofvirginia Homepage Download Apple Podcasts Google Podcasts Overcast Castro Pocket Casts RSS feed
This podcast is provided by Ben Glass and Steve Emmert
www.BenGlassReferrals.com - www.Virginia-Appeals.com
Granted Appeal Summary
Case
KIRK SOSEBEE, ET AL. v. FRANKLIN COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD (Record Number 190620)
From
The Circuit Court of Franklin County; C. Perdue, Judge.
Counsel
Peter K. Kamakawiwoole, Jr. (Home School Legal Defense Association) and Melvin E. Williams (Mel Williams PLC) for appellants.
Stephen M. Maddy (Maddy & Nester, PLLC) for appellee.
Assignments of Error
1. The Circuit Court misconstrued clear statutory language in holding that the School Board’s local policy was consistent with Code § 22.1-254.1. Virginia law states that parents may homeschool when they submit a written notice containing certain statutorily-required information to their local public school Superintendent. The Sosebees gave their Superintendent a written notice with this information, and also included their child’s name, age, and home address. The School Board adopted a policy which amends the state’s homeschool statute to also require a birth certificate and proof of residency. The power to amend statutes is the power to make law; that power rests squarely and solely with the General Assembly, not school boards.
2. The Circuit Court misconstrued clear statutory language in holding that the School Board’s policy was permitted by Code § 22.1-78. School boards may adopt regulations consistent with state statutes for their own government, the management of official business, and the supervision of schools. Code § 22.1-78. The Board’s policy rejects notices of intent that otherwise comply with the homeschool statute, but nothing in that statute grants school boards or officials any discretion over the content of homeschool notices.
3. The Circuit Court erred in holding that the Board’s local policy was not ultra vires and that it was permissible because it furthered public policy. School boards only possess powers granted by the General Assembly expressly or by necessary implication. A policy that goes beyond those powers, or criminalizes lawful conduct, is ultra vires. The Board’s policy threatens families who
submit all statutorily-required information with prosecution, unless they also submit a birth certificate and proof of residency.
http://www.courts.state.va.us/courts/scv/appeals/190620.pdf
This podcast is brought to you by Virginia Injury and Disability law firm, Ben Glass Law.
Real legal help for real people
Your life has been disrupted. You have good doctors and they support you. Your personal injury or long-term disability claim seems like a slam dunk. But there’s a problem: The insurance company doesn’t believe you. “You can’t be hurt that bad! Our medical experts say you’re fine.”
You need a trusted advocate who can uncover all the facts, tell your story to the skeptical insurance company, and get you the money you deserve. You don’t have to do this alone. Contact our Virginia personal injury and long-term disability lawyers today for a free consultation or denial letter review.