![Opening Arguments artwork](https://is4-ssl.mzstatic.com/image/thumb/Podcasts113/v4/6c/e1/d0/6ce1d0a2-0b15-741b-69f3-81d95ff334a0/mza_6937894268357698692.jpg/100x100bb.jpg)
OA573: Harvard Law Review Publishes Dubious Note on Election Law
Opening Arguments
English - March 01, 2022 05:00 - 1 hour - 83.1 MB - ★★★★ - 3.4K ratingsPolitics News News Commentary atheist opinion harvard law legal liberal news politics supremecourt Homepage Download Apple Podcasts Google Podcasts Overcast Castro Pocket Casts RSS feed
Previous Episode: OA572.5: Biden Picks Ketanji Brown Jackson!
Next Episode: OA574: 1/6 Committee Brief Says Trump Guilty of Crimes!
A note in the Harvard Law Review suggests we ought to "Remove presidential elections from the Anderson-Burdick Framework." So, just what does that mean and is it a good idea? Listen in as Andrew breaks it down! Also, we've got an update in the Madison Cawthorn situation, and more Kraken sanctions updates!
Links: remedial election plan ruling, Special Masters plan, another kraken loss, Judge Parker ruling, 6th Circuit appeal, Removing Presidential Elections from the Anderson-Burdick Framework - Harvard Law Review