The Mandela effect is an innocent topic if we’re discussing false memories of your childhood references. But this isn’t true when you think about the implications of false memory leading to false confessions.

This happened to the eighteen-year-old Peter Reilly, who sat in the interrogation room having signed the confession that he’d brutally murdered his own mother, 51-year-old Barbara Gibbons, after 25 hours of intense questioning. The only problem - he was innocent. In 1975, two years after his conviction, Peter walked free, exonerated by evidence that proved he couldn’t have been at the scene of the crime.

What were the motives behind his confession?

The Innocence Project movement in the US, which seeks to exonerate innocent convicts through modern DNA testing, says false memory plays a role in more than 70 per cent of the wrongful convictions they overturn. In ten per cent of those cases, their clients originally pleaded guilty, serving an average of 14 years for crimes that they didn’t commit.

To support Innocence project cases, click here: https://www.innocenceproject.org

Find me on Insta / Twitter and check out the Patreon page for bonus content - May Motivesode plus bonus weekly content is already out:
Instagram.com/ thatbamnpod
twitter.com/thatbamnpod
www.patreon.com/thatbamnpod

Hit me up with your thoughts and motives behind famous crimes : [email protected]

Intro and background music by https://www.fesliyanstudios.com.

Sources:
https://www.readersdigest.co.uk/inspire/life/murder-and-mind-hackers-beyond-the-memory-illusion

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_memory

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catherine_Roraback

https://www.encyclopedia.com/law/law-magazines/peter-reilly-trial-1974-1976

Twitter Mentions