![Mint Views Daily Dispatch artwork](https://is2-ssl.mzstatic.com/image/thumb/Podcasts123/v4/4a/df/eb/4adfeb3e-2260-575f-fc54-6f08d126af71/mza_4553784818730624990.jpg/100x100bb.jpg)
28: Sabarimala issue: gender equality vs freedom of religion
Mint Views Daily Dispatch
English - November 14, 2019 13:52 - 7 minutes - 7.09 MBNews Commentary News news podcasts trending podcasts daily dose daily news trendy podcast current affairs news bites best podcasts listens news Homepage Download Apple Podcasts Google Podcasts Overcast Castro Pocket Casts RSS feed
Previous Episode: 27: Could the SC order dislodge Yediyurappa in Karnataka?
A five-judge bench of the Supreme Court has referred the review of its judgment in the Sabarimala case to a larger seven-judge bench. In its 2018 ruling, the top court had ordered that menstruating women must also be allowed to enter the temple. The petitioners, however, argue that this violates their freedom to religion. So are women being discriminated against or are religious practices being meddled with?