MBA Episode 48: Doubting Dawkins – No, the Human Eye Isn’t an Example of Bad Design (a Discussion on Design Constraints)

In this episode of the Mama Bear Apologetics podcast, we’re continuing our dissection of Richard Dawkins’ book, Outgrowing God, in our Doubting Dawkins series. Today, Hillary and Amy discuss chapters 7 and 8, which were the easiest to go through of all of the chapters for us. In Hillary’s opinion, this is where the book […]

The post MBA Episode 48: Doubting Dawkins – No, the Human Eye Isn’t an Example of Bad Design (a Discussion on Design Constraints) appeared first on Mama Bear Apologetics.

In this episode of the Mama Bear Apologetics podcast, we’re continuing our dissection of Richard Dawkins’ book, Outgrowing God, in our Doubting Dawkins series. Today, Hillary and Amy discuss chapters 7 and 8, which were the easiest to go through of all of the chapters for us. In Hillary’s opinion, this is where the book begins to shine. There are lots of links, photos, and videos that kids and parents, alike, will find fascinating.

Since Hillary comes from a biology background, she loves reading about how things work. He’s presenting evidence. Within these chapters, it’s clear that Dawkins becomes a stronger writer when he discusses animals in general, as opposed to his passages that speak about topics at a more molecular level. His specialty is, after all, zoology (specifically ethology, the study of animal behavior). When comparing these two chapters with others in the rest of the book, it becomes painfully clear that very little of what he writes is in line with his academic specialty.

We hope you learn a little more about how to sift through ideas, accept the good, reject the bad, and now you can teach your kids to do the same.

Do you have any questions, comments, or ideas for future episodes? Send us an email at [email protected].

Main Points Covered:

What is Intelligent Design?
The first two main camps in the arguments for creationism are: young creationists and older generation creationists:

Younger creationists

Theistic evolutionists

Older creationists

Dawkins begins by talking about cheetahs, gazelles, the heart, and how they are designed.

“If you’ve seen a film of a gazelle and a cheetah running—perhaps one of David’s Attenborough’s documentaries—you’ve probably noticed how beautifully, how elegantly designed both animals seem to be” (emphasis in original). (Outgrowing God, 146)
Imperfect design
Dawkins claims that octopus eyes and human eyes are an example of imperfect designs.

https://www.quora.com/Why-are-the-eyes-of-octopus-and-mammals-homologous

This is a false presentation of the information.
He is comparing the eye to the camera.
Backward wiring = improved oxygen flow
Verted versus Inverted Retina
If he’s a biologist, why misrepresent this information?

The Design of a Larynx
Junk DNA
Cephalopods and chameleons
Parents: Give us examples of what you have seen as design constraints.
Closing Prayer

Quotable Quotes:

Design constraints exist. That doesn’t mean that there is a design flaw.
Click To Tweet

Don’t be afraid of science. What we need is more science, better science. The more details the better!
Click To Tweet

God cannot be the same nature as His creation because material things cannot bring themselves into existence and are ultimately dependent upon something else.
Click To Tweet

Resources Mentioned:

Richard Dawkins, Outgrowing God. The text that we have been discussing can be found on Amazon.

Jerry Bergman, Inverted Human Eye a Poor Design? Article about the design of the human eye. Is it a poor design?

Jerry Bergman and Joseph Calkins, Is the Backwards Human Retina Evidence of Poor Design? We referenced this while we were talking about the design of the human eye.

Helga Kolb, “How the Retina Works” This article was published in a 2003 edition of American Scientist about intelligent design and the biology behind the retina.

Wolf-Ekkehard Lönnig, “The Laryngeal Nerve of the Giraffe.. Does it prove evolution?” This topic was discussed in chapter seven of Dawkins’s book.

Casey Luskin, The Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Does Not Refute Intelligent Design, an article from the Idea Center to help you understand more about the laryngeal nerve.

Insane in the Chromatophores, YouTube video. This was suggested by Dawkins as an interesting and entertaining example of how chromatophores in cephalopods work.

 

Donate to the podcast on our website.

Looking for detailed podcast notes, which include time-stamps, definitions, full Bible verses, and more? We provide them to Patrons on Patreon who donate $10 per month or more. If you’re interested in learning more about Patreon and our giving levels, please visit patreon.com/MamaBearApologetics.

 

Hillary Morgan Ferrer

Hillary Morgan Ferrer is the founder of Mama Bear Apologetics. She is the chief author and editor of Mama Bear Apologetics: Empowering Your Kids to Challenge Cultural Lies and Mama Bear Apologetics Guide to Sexuality: Empowering Your Kids to Understand and Live Out God’s Design. Hillary has her masters in Biology and has been married to her husband, Dr. John D. Ferrer, for 15 years. Don’t let her cook for you. She’ll burn your house straight to the ground.

www.mamabearapologetics.com

The post MBA Episode 48: Doubting Dawkins – No, the Human Eye Isn’t an Example of Bad Design (a Discussion on Design Constraints) appeared first on Mama Bear Apologetics.