JurisDiction — The International Intellectual Property Law Podcast
50 episodes - English - Latest episode: about 5 years ago -Just another WordPress site
Homepage Apple Podcasts Google Podcasts Overcast Castro Pocket Casts RSS feed
Episodes
Episode 53 — April 2019
April 16, 2019 01:38David Pekarek Krohn and Danielle Grant-Keane of Perkins Coie LLP discuss “The Coming Wave – Preparing for the Rise of Patent Litigation in the Augmented and Virtual Reality Sector”. (Length:27:28) Download MP3
Episode 52 — February 2019
March 21, 2019 01:49Johannes Hsu of Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP in Irvine, California discusses the Tabaian v. Intel Corp. decision and his paper “Disqualifying an Expert: When is an Expert’s Prior Relationship Prejudicial to the Opposing Party?” (Length:10:20) Download MP3
Episode 51 — November 2018
November 30, 2018 02:41Dr. Sarah Kagan of Banner & Witcoff in Washington D.C. discusses “Patent Wars: Genome Editing” and the latest developments in the CRISPR patent wars: U Cal v. Broad. (Length: 19:55) Download MP3
Episode 50 — November 2018
November 30, 2018 02:30Eric Ball and Athul Acharya of Fenwick & West discuss their article “Honey Badger Don’t Care, but the Lanham Act Might” regarding Gordon v. Drape Creative and trademarks vs freedom of speech. (Length: 13:21) Download MP3
Episode 49 — October 2018
October 27, 2018 21:35Christopher Loh of Fitzpatrick Cella Harper & Scinto in New York City discusses the Amgen v. Sanofi CAFC decision and his paper “End of ‘well characterized antigen’ test?” (Length: 20:08) Download MP3
Episode 48 — September 2018
September 16, 2018 19:20Linda Wadler and Alissa Lipton of Finnegan discuss the SCOTUS decision in WesternGeco v. Ion Geophysical regarding recovering foreign lost profits damages for patent infringement. Their case comment. (Length: 21:06) Download MP3
Episode 47 — April 2018
August 09, 2018 02:30Don Cameron of Bereskin & Parr LLP and Jerry Chen of JZC Intellectual Property Law discuss their involvement as counsel in Canada’s first electronic patent trial. (Length: 24:40) Download MP3
Episode 46 — January 2018
February 11, 2018 23:27Prof. Ben Alarie of BlueJ Legal on “Using Machine Learning to Predict Legal Outcomes”. (Length: 43:19) Download MP3
Episode 45 — July 2017
August 12, 2017 22:57Micheline Gravelle, Don MacOdrum, Mike Fenwick and Don Cameron of Bereskin & Parr LLP discuss “The Promise of the Patent” and the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in Astrazeneca (Length: 55:16) Download MP3
Episode 44 — March 2017
March 28, 2017 05:07John Crittenden of Cooley discusses reverse confusion of trademarks in “Squirrels Armed with Bazookas”. (Length: 28:29) Download MP3
Episode 43 — November 2016
December 11, 2016 20:15Prof. Christopher Robertson of the University of Arizona on blinding expert witnesses to reduce bias: Bias in Litigation Science and Blind Expertise. (Length: 21:25) Download MP3
Episode 42 — July 2016
August 11, 2016 03:43Jeanne M. Gills of Foley & Lardner LLP in Chicago discusses “What’s Reasonable? Protecting And Enforcing Trade Secrets” (article, slides). (Length: 39:22) Download MP3
Episode 41 — May 2016
July 07, 2016 02:46Philip Petti of USG Corporation in Chicago discusses “Protecting Trade Secrets” Download MP3
January 2016 — Episode 40
February 08, 2016 03:38Philip Harrison of Venner Shipley discusses the “Patentability of Computer Implemented Inventions in Europe” Download MP3
July 2015 — Episode 39
July 29, 2015 01:16Marco Quina of Foley Hoag discusses Kimble v Marvel and “How Not to Get Snared in Brulotte’s Web” (Length: 29:50) Download MP3
June 2015 — Episode 38
July 01, 2015 04:55Bruce Sunstein of Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP discusses Patent Strategies for Getting a Software Patent Invention Through the Alice Thicket. (Sunstein Law Review article on Alice) (Length: 33:23) Download MP3
April 2015 – Episode 37
April 30, 2015 15:14William Jay of Goodwin Procter LLP discusses issue preclusion and the SCOTUS decision in B&B Hardware v. Hargis. (Length: 30:32) Download MP3
March 2015 – Episode 36
March 27, 2015 03:08Elliot Cook of Finnegan Henderson discusses patent eligibility in the wake of Alice, Ultramercial and DDR. (Length: 22:49) Download MP3
January 2015 – Episode 35
February 22, 2015 23:57Cynthia Rowden and Scott MacKendrick of Bereskin & Parr LLP in Toronto discuss “Canada Takes the Battle on Counterfeits to its Borders”. (Length: 21:05) Download MP3
September 2014 – Episode 34
October 07, 2014 03:28Katharine Stephens of Bird & Bird, London, England, discusses Unitary Patents and the Unified Patent Court. (Length: 16:37) Download MP3
August 2014 – Episode 33
August 26, 2014 03:04Mark Powell and Maria Holtmann of The Office for International Patent Cooperation, USPTO, Washington D.C., discuss “The Global Dossier Initiative”. (Video) (Length: 16:54) Download MP3
July 2014 – Episode 32
August 19, 2014 02:24Cynthia Rowden and Scott MacKendrick of Bereskin & Parr LLP in Toronto describe “Big Changes to the Canadian Trade-marks Act – What You Need to Know, Now”. (Length: 57:38) Download MP3
October 2013 – Episode 31
October 12, 2013 04:57Rob Reid, author of “Year Zero” discusses the absurdity of copyright law, aliens and treble damages. See also his Ted Talk on The $8 billion iPod and the ABA Landslide book review of Year Zero. (Length: 20:36) Download MP3
July 2013 – Episode 30
July 31, 2013 03:08Mark Wine of Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP in Irvine, California discusses “The Extraterritorial Reach of the ITC in SI Group v. Sino Legend”. See also Orrick’s quarterly report “The World in US Courts” and Trade Secrets Watch blog. (Length: … Continue reading →
June 2013 – Episode 29
July 07, 2013 23:01Christopher Carani of McAndrews Held & Malloy Ltd in Chicago Illinois and DesignPatentAttorney.com on “Apple v. Samsung” (Length: 39:12) Download MP3
May 2013 – Episode 28
June 03, 2013 05:21Selvyn Seidel of Fulbrook Capital Management in New York City on “Third Party Financing of Patent Litigation” (Length: 26:27) Download MP3
January 2013 – Episode 27
March 02, 2013 04:59Belinda Scrimenti of Pattishall, McAuliffe, Newbury, Hilliard & Geraldson LLP in Chicago discusses her papers entitled “100 Years of Seeing RED – A Historical Perspective on the Second Circuit’s “Red-Sole Shoe” Mark Decision in Louboutin v. Yves Saint Laurent” and … Continue reading →
November 2012 – Episode 26
January 25, 2013 03:54Donald M. Cameron of Bereskin & Parr LLP in Toronto Canada explains the Canadian Supreme Court decision in Teva v. Pfizer on the VIAGRA use patent. (Length: 12:39) Download MP3
July 2012 – Episode 25
August 10, 2012 04:23Karen Canady of canady + lortz LLP in Los Angeles provides a patent attorney’s view of the basics of genes and the hotly-contested litigation over biotechnology patents. (Length: 11:12) Download MP3
June 2012 – Episode 24
June 30, 2012 05:17Trevor Cook of Bird & Bird, London England discusses “English Patent Litigation – Under New Management” (Length: 17:53) Download MP3
May 2012 – Episode 23
June 10, 2012 03:40 - 14 MBJames Gould, of Locke Lord LLP, New York City discusses “Comics and Copyright and a Super Legal Battle” (Length: 15:20) Download MP3
April 2012 – Episode 22
June 08, 2012 04:10Cynthia Lopez Beverage of ST Ericsson in Santa Clara California discusses “Surviving in a Secondary Patent Marketplace”. (Length: 22:23) Download MP3
March 2012 – Episode 21
April 27, 2012 04:25Robert Fischer of Fitzpatrick Cella Harper & Scinto in New York City discusses the history and recent cases involving patentable subject matter in the computer and business methods areas. (Length: 26:11) Download MP3
December 2011 – Episode 20
December 07, 2011 06:42Gareth Morgan of Winston & Strawn LLP, London, England explains the Human Genome Sciences v. Eli Lilly decision of the UK Supreme Court and the meaning of “industrial applicability” for protein related inventions. (Length: 35:19) Download MP3
November 2011 – Episode 19
November 26, 2011 06:42Bart Showalter of Baker Botts LLP in Dallas, Texas on “The Top US Patent Decisions of 2010-2011” and why these decisions were worthy of receiving a “Markey” award for their individual category. (Length: 34:12) Download MP3
December 2010 – Episode 18
December 12, 2010 06:41Paul England of the London Office of Simmons & Simmons discusses “Cross-border Injunctions in Europe” (Length: 18:22) Download MP3
November 2010 – Episode 17
November 22, 2010 06:40Thomas M. Williams of Howrey’s False Marking Task Force in Chicago, Illinois: “False Patent Marking and the Solo Cup Case”. Donald M. Cameron of Cameron MacKendrick LLP, Toronto, Canada: “The Amazon.com one-click Canadian Patent Decision” (Length: 14:24) Download MP3
October 2010 – Episode 16
October 09, 2010 06:39Christopher Marchese of Fish & Richardson, San Diego, California: “Runaway Patent Damages Awards: Is Statutory Reform on the Way?” See also Chris’ Patent Damages blog, on Twitter (patentdamages), the F&R patent damages web page and Patent Damages Law and Practice … Continue reading →
September 2010 – Episode 15
September 09, 2010 06:38DeAnn Smith of Foley Hoag LLP in Boston, Mass.: “Chemically Complicated: Effective Arguments to Combat “Obvious to Try” Rejections with respect to Takeda and the Chemical Arts“. (Length: 14:24) Download MP3
August 2010 – Episode 14
August 29, 2010 06:38Frederick L. Whitmer of Kilpatrick Stockton LLP in New York City explains the Cybor Uncertainty Principle in “Claim Construction in Patent Law: A Question of Law?”. (Length: 30:37) Download MP3
July 2010 – Episode 13
July 18, 2010 06:37Dale Lazar, of DLA Piper in Reston, Virginia discusses the Supreme Court of the United State’s Bilski decision on the patentability of business methods. (Length: 17:00) Download MP3
December 2009 – Episode 12
December 15, 2009 06:36Jennifer Silverman of Ellenoff Grossman and Schole LLP in New York City discusses U.S. trademark dilution and the Dec. 3, 2009 decision in Starbucks vs. Wolfe’s Borough (Charbucks) lawsuit. (Length: 17:00) Download MP3
November 2009 – Episode 11
November 15, 2009 06:35The New Jersey Patent Rules – one year later. Guests Stephen Roth of Lerner David Littenberg Krumholz and Mentlik, LLP in Westfield, New Jersey and Philip Johnson, Chief Intellectual Property Counsel at Johnson and Johnson in New Brunswick, New Jersey … Continue reading →
October 2009 – Episode 10
October 15, 2009 06:35In Re Bose and Fraud on the US Trademarks Office regarding declarations of use. Guests: Jonathan Hudis of Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier and Neustadt, LLP and Kimberley Seluga of Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP Bose case comment. (Length: 16:54) … Continue reading →
September 2009 – Episode 9
September 28, 2009 06:34Krista Schwartz of Jones Day on “Software and Scenes a Faire” in computer copyright cases and Charles Weiss of Kenyon and Kenyon on “Ariad: Federal Circuit to Consider Existence of Written Description Requirement”. (Length: 39:16) Download MP3
August 2009 – Episode 8
August 19, 2009 06:33Niri Shanmuganathan of the London office of Taylor Wessing discusses Liability for User Generated Content on the Internet and Ed Reines of the Silicon Valley office of Weil, Gotshal and Manges LLP discusses Interlocutory Appeals of Claim Construction in the … Continue reading →
July 2009 – Episode 7
July 12, 2009 04:55Chris Hansen of the ACLU in New York City and Warren Woessner of Schwegman Lundberg Woessner in Minneapolis discuss the Complaint filed by doctor and patient groups against the patents on the BRCA1 and BRCA2 cancer genes exclusively licensed to … Continue reading →
June 2009 – Episode 6
June 12, 2009 04:51The Honourable Michael Black AC, the Chief Justice of the Federal Court of Australia, discusses the Fast Track Direction that affects trade-mark and copyright cases issued April 2009. It is part of an aggressive overhaul of the case management and … Continue reading →
May 2009 – Episode 5
May 30, 2009 04:37The Right Honourable Sir Robin Jacob of the Court of Appeal of England and Wales discusses his submissions to the European Commission Pharma Sector Inquiry. Baila Celedonia of Cowan Liebowitz and Latman of New York City discusses Honda v. Winkelmann … Continue reading →
April 2009 – Episode 4
April 24, 2009 04:35Rowan Freeland of Simmons and Simmons in London discusses the UK House of Lords decision in Lundbeck on sufficiency of disclosure in UK patents. See also his case comment. Robert Yoches of Finnegan in Washington, D.C. discusses US patent practice … Continue reading →