Perspectives on Transparency in Peer Review - Parts 1-4 #PeerRevWk17

J&J Editorial Podcast

English - September 15, 2017 17:08 - 1 hour - 79.5 MB - ★★★★★ - 1 rating
Science Society & Culture publishing peer review best practices copy editing editorial j&j editorial journal Homepage Download Apple Podcasts Google Podcasts Overcast Castro Pocket Casts RSS feed

Previous Episode: Perspectives on Transparency in Peer Review - Part 4 #PeerRevWk17

Next Episode: Top 5 Disruptions in Scholarly Publishing in 2017

Parts 1-4 of our Transparency in Peer Review discussion with Tom Lang (Tom Lang Communications and Training International), Allison Leung (PLOS), David Resnik, JD, PhD (NIEHS), and Pedro Ramirez, MD (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center). In this installment we take a closer look at

1. What transparency means 2. How transparency benefits the researcher 3. How transparency benefits the public 4. How transparency addresses the limitations of traditional peer review

Music: www.bensound.com

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.