Investopoly artwork

Not all low-cost indexes exhibit the same risks and opportunities

Investopoly

English - June 24, 2020 01:44 - 23 minutes - 16.1 MB - ★ - 1 rating
Investing Business investing financial advice property shares tax borrowing wealth retirement super Homepage Download Apple Podcasts Google Podcasts Overcast Castro Pocket Casts RSS feed


Over the past decade, investors and large institutions have been deserting expensive active fund managers in return for using their cheaper index equivalents.
According to Morningstar, investors in the US withdrew $USD204 million from actively managed investments (net) in the 2019 calendar year. However, low cost index funds continued to grow in popularity receiving (net) $USD162 million of new money. The transition away from active management into low-cost index funds has been happening for over a decade.
Whilst it is true that traditional market cap indexing has outperformed many professional managers over long periods of time, it does have its shortcomings, particularly in markets other than bull markets.
It is my thesis that investors would be well advised to employ a selection of fundamentally sound indexing methodologies. Doing so can reduce a portfolios risk and potentially expose it to higher future returns.
What are the recent stats of index versus active?Index funds are popular for good reasons. As I have written about previously, index funds typically produce better returns over the long run and charge much lower fees.
For example, only 16% of active fund managers have produced better returns than the index over the past 15 years in Australia (and only 11% in the US). However, it is important to note that the same fund managers have beaten the market each and every year. In fact, active fund managers may only outperform for one or two years. Statistics show that their outperformance almost never persists for longer periods of time.
According to data published by S&P Dow Jones, 81 Australian fund managers where in the top quartile in terms of performance for the 2015 year. Only 11 out of 81 remained in the top quartile a year later i.e. 2016 calendar year. And only 5 out of 81 were able to string three good years together (i.e. were in top quartile in terms of performance for 2015, 2016 and 2017). It is clear that ‘picking’ an active manager that will outperform is a very difficult thing to do, as it is likely you will need to chop a

ASK ME A QUESTION ON YOUTUBE: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ACnxmEP8vv8

My YouTube channel: https://youtube.com/@investopolypodcast

If this episode resonated with you, please leave a rating on your favourite podcast platform. It helps me reach more incredible listeners like you. Thank you for being a part of this journey! :-)

Click here to subscribe to Stuart's weekly email.

SPECIAL OFFER: Buy a one of Stuart's books for ONLY $20 including delivery. Use the discount code blog here.

Work with Stuart's team: At ProSolution Private Clients we encourage clients to adopt a holistic and evidence-based approach when making financial decisions. Visit our website.

IMPORTANT: This podcast provides general information about finance, taxes, and credit. This means that the content does not consider your specific objectives, financial situation, or needs. It is crucial for you to assess whether the information is suitable for your circumstances before taking any actions based on it. If you find yourself uncertain about the relevance or your specific needs, it is advisable to seek advice from a licensed and trustworthy professional.