Today Debbie tackles the topic of aging (better? longer??) with Andrew Steele, an ebullient British scientist, writer and author of Ageless: The New Science of Getting Older Without Getting Old.

After earning a PhD in physics from Oxford, Andrew decided that aging -  not cancer or other diseases - was the single most important scientific challenge of our time. Why? Because of the suffering that goes along with old age.

So he switched fields to biogerontology, the study of the processes of aging at the cellular level.

Andrew, 37, doesn’t advocate for immortality. As he puts it: “It’s not about extending lifespan, but rather healthspan." His interest, he maintains, is in helping humans stay healthier longer. 

Debbie asks Andrew what the most important biological aging processes are. He responds with a clear explanation of cell biology as it relates to aging: from senescent cells and cellular exhaustion to your epigenetic age, and more.

And he explains that some of these genes and processes can be manipulated to slow or possibly reverse aging - at least, so far, in worms and mice.

Andrew is exuberant and makes everything understandable.


They talk about:

The 10 hallmarks of the aging processSpecifically, how research on worms and mice translates to humansWhy 65 - 70 could be the ideal age to take an anti-aging pill (no, it doesn't exist yet)


They also discuss:

Dietary restriction (a topic of aging research since the 1950s)Why the mega-wealthy are so interested in biohacking to improve health and extend lifeMoral and ethical implications of humans living much longer


This is an important conversation and we hope you will find it as thought provoking as we did.  

 

Mentioned in this episode or useful:

BioYouTube channelHow science can reverse aging - and why we'd want to (video)TwitterInstagram


Andrew's book and bonus chapter

Ageless: The New Science of Getting Older Without Getting Old by Andrew Steele (Doubleday, 2021)Bonus chapter: The ethics of ageing biology by Andrew SteeleVideo from bonus chapter: Would curing aging destroy the planet?


Articles and references

BiogerontologyLooking Forward to Your 170th Birthday by Annie Murphy Paul (New York Times Book Review, April 2, 2021)Why Anti-Aging Science is so Alluring by Daniela J. Lamas (New York Times, Jan. 4, 2023)The Hallmarks of Aging by Carlos López-Otín, Maria A Blasco, Linda Partridge, Manuel Serrano, Guido Kroemer (Pubmed, June 6, 2013)Viral Tweet about Blueprint & Bryan JohnsonCAR T Cells: Engineering Immune Cells to Treat Cancer (National Cancer Institute)

 

Get the inside skinny on every episode of [B]OLDER:

Subscribe to Debbie’s newsletter for the inside story about every episode. You will also get her 34-page writing guide: https://bitly.com/debbie-free-guide.

 

Request from Debbie:

If you've been enjoying the podcast, please take a moment to leave a short review on Apple Podcasts. It really makes a difference in attracting new listeners. 

 

Connect with Debbie:

debbieweil.com[B]OLDER podcastEmail: [email protected]Blog: Gap Year After SixtyFacebook: @debbieweilInstagram: @debbieweilLinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/debbieweilTwitter: @debbieweil

 

Our Media Partners:

CoGenerate (formerly Encore.org)MEA and with thanks to Chip ConleyNext For Me (former media partner and in memory of Jeff Tidwell)

 

How to Support this podcast:

Leave a review on Apple PodcastsSubscribe via Apple Podcasts, Google Podcasts, Stitcher or Spotify

 

Credits:

Host: Debbie WeilProducer: Far Out MediaMusic: Lakeside Path by Duck Lake

Twitter Mentions