As of earlier in the week, Google’s parent company Alphabet had around a $1.02 trillion — yes, with a T — market capitalization.


















Google co-founder Sergey Brin.







Yet the company still can’t explain to shareholders & users why both of its founders, still prominent within the company at the time of their departure, abruptly resigned last year — even as Alphabet was enjoying historic growth.

Nor can it explain why one of those founders, Sergey Brin, reportedly remained in contact with Jeffrey Epstein, even meeting with him after his first conviction years ago.

And Google’s apparently manual censorship of the Epstein scandal has been unlike anything we have ever witnessed as journalists — it has literally no precedent in the field of online publishing & search engines, at least not in the West. An order of magnitude worse than any other Big Tech staple toward Epstein and “Pedogate” information spreading — why is that? Is it related to Sergey Brin’s former closeness to the convicted, now deceased pedophile child trafficking billionaire?

As FULCRUM has reported previously:

No other social media platform has punished Pedogate truthers as Google and YouTube have. Our Facebook and Twitter presences as a news company, for example, are still roaring—with 11,100 committed followers on our lively Facebook Page, and millions of views each month across our Twitter and Periscope feeds.

Why is Google more triggered by John Podesta’s emails and Jeffrey Epstein’s child rape island than all the other Big Tech giants combined? (Amazon, also, has not censored FULCRUM.)

Although Google should be celebrated for its historic valuation and contributions to the US economy, the behaviors of its search engine and video platform toward mere notional supporters of America’s President, mere notional supporters of prosecuting child trafficking offenses, and mere notional supporters of a strong nation — is entirely pathetic, and beneath the aims of any true global information giant. Google’s CFO, Ruth Porat, cried in front of an internal company event after the election results came in back in 2016 — not exactly impartial, or stoic.

This is an overtly liberal biased company practicing levels of censorship that would make the Chinese government blush, and it needs to be held accountable — despite its success in the stock market.

Users should seek out alternatives that better respect their politics, voices, and views.

Keep reading: Google Co-Founder Sergey Brin Visited Epstein AFTER First Conviction; Is This Why YouTube Censors #Pedogate?

Twitter Mentions