![Feedstuffs in Focus artwork](https://is3-ssl.mzstatic.com/image/thumb/Podcasts123/v4/17/e4/e6/17e4e6ac-6419-7d3f-9e22-80a16690a0a3/mza_5244509669059660635.jpg/100x100bb.jpg)
Canada, now Australia, why not the U.S.?
Feedstuffs in Focus
English - December 18, 2020 17:15 - 14 minutes - 13.1 MB - ★★★★★ - 7 ratingsBusiness News News Business Marketing agriculture cattle industry agribusiness agriculture economics animal health animal nutrition beef chicken farming feed industry Homepage Download Apple Podcasts Google Podcasts Overcast Castro Pocket Casts RSS feed
When it comes to imported feed ingredients, it is important for feed manufacturers and livestock producers to have as much information as possible related to that ingredient and its origin. At stake is the health of our nation’s herds as unapproved ingredients can introduce significant disease risks.
Unlike in Canada and now in Australia, the U.S. lacks any requirement that a supplier or trader confirm each imported biological ingredient is approved for animal feed use.
Feedstuffs editor Sarah Muirhead recently caught up with Dr. Scott Dee of Pipestone Veterinary Services to talk about how some countries are taking biosecurity to the next level and what needs to be done here in the U.S. to put in place those same safeguards.
This episode of Feedstuffs In Focus is sponsored by United Animal Health, a leader in animal health and nutrition. You can learn more about United Animal Health and how they are working to advance animal science worldwide by visiting their website UnitedANH.com.
For more information on this and other stories, visit Feedstuffs online.
Follow Feedstuffs on Twitter @Feedstuffs, or join the conversation via Facebook.