77: Promiscuous expertise

Everything Hertz

English - February 04, 2019 07:30 - 55 minutes - 50.6 MB - ★★★★★ - 55 ratings
Social Sciences Science Health & Fitness Medicine psychology science research academia Homepage Download Apple Podcasts Google Podcasts Overcast Castro Pocket Casts RSS feed

Previous Episode: 76: Open peer review

Next Episode: 78: Large-scale collaborative science (with Lisa DeBruine)

Dan and James discuss how to deal with the problem of scientists who start talking about topics outside their area of expertise. They also discuss what they would do differently if they would do their PhDs again
Here's what they cover...
The podcast will now be permanently archived on Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/zj7y3/)
James did a talk at the Sound Education conference on podcasting for early career researchers. Here's the video (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=26t6660_f-A) if you want to see him squirm uncomfortably in his chair for 20 minutes and/or hear his thoughts our approach to podcasting
The temptation for academics to believe their own press and to have their thoughts reinforced by the praise they get
Keeping a handle on what you know and don't know
Nassim Nicholas Taleb (https://twitter.com/nntaleb) has FANS
The "Pete Evans" effect, James' solution, that we should eat Pete Evans (https://medium.com/@jamesheathers/i-think-i-have-a-solution-i-m-going-to-eat-pete-evans-7e2da6f3967f), pesca-pescaterianism (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IC-ZBJ-Kw2E), and the spectacularly bad advice that we should stare into the sun (https://www.sciencealert.com/please-don-t-stare-at-the-sun-even-if-pete-evans-says-it-s-good-for-you)
You should follow gynecologist Jennifer Gunter on Twitter (https://twitter.com/DrJenGunter)
How much money would you pay for 100,000 engaged twitter followers? Here's the tweet (https://twitter.com/ImHardcory/status/1090213113352372224) James was referring to
Should researchers have something like a Hippocratic Oath (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hippocratic_Oath)? How would we police this?
Researchers are not good at admitting they're wrong, do we need to approach retractions differently?
Would a bounty system, in which journals offer rewards, for finding errors in their papers, work well?
The "Loss of confidence (https://lossofconfidence.com)" project, and Rebecca Willen's CV (https://rmwillen.info/publications/)
The "Nobel disease" (http://skepdic.com/nobeldisease.html)
Other links
- Dan on twitter (www.twitter.com/dsquintana)
- James on twitter (www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)
- Everything Hertz on twitter (www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast)
- Everything Hertz on Facebook (www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)
Music credits: Lee Rosevere (freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
Support us on Patreon (https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast) and get bonus stuff!
$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos & video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you're supporting the show
$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the $1 tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn't include in our regular episodes)
Episode citation and permanent link
Quintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2019, February 4) "Promiscuous expertise", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], doi: 10.17605/OSF.IO/VYCAH (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/VYCAH)

Here's what they cover...

The podcast will now be permanently archived on Open Science Framework
James did a talk at the Sound Education conference on podcasting for early career researchers. Here's the video if you want to see him squirm uncomfortably in his chair for 20 minutes and/or hear his thoughts our approach to podcasting
The temptation for academics to believe their own press and to have their thoughts reinforced by the praise they get
Keeping a handle on what you know and don't know
Nassim Nicholas Taleb has FANS
The "Pete Evans" effect, James' solution, that we should eat Pete Evans, pesca-pescaterianism, and the spectacularly bad advice that we should stare into the sun
You should follow gynecologist Jennifer Gunter on Twitter
How much money would you pay for 100,000 engaged twitter followers? Here's the tweet James was referring to
Should researchers have something like a Hippocratic Oath? How would we police this?
Researchers are not good at admitting they're wrong, do we need to approach retractions differently?
Would a bounty system, in which journals offer rewards, for finding errors in their papers, work well?
The "Loss of confidence" project, and Rebecca Willen's CV
The "Nobel disease"

77: Promiscuous expertise

Everything Hertz

Twitter Mentions