![Employment Law This Week Podcast artwork](https://is3-ssl.mzstatic.com/image/thumb/Podcasts123/v4/ff/29/77/ff2977cd-725a-bf49-ccc7-38a1438eb7f7/mza_6746781620670650250.png/100x100bb.jpg)
Spilling Secrets: Invention Ownership: Why the Tense Matters in Employee IP Provisions
Employment Law This Week Podcast
English - January 24, 2024 14:29 - 23 minutes - 33.2 MB - ★★★★★ - 15 ratingsBusiness News Business News attorney business legal employmentlaw law lawfirm lawyer management startups Homepage Download Apple Podcasts Google Podcasts Overcast Castro Pocket Casts RSS feed
On an employee’s first day, employers can begin protecting trade secrets by ensuring they maintain ownership over all intellectual property (IP) that the employee will create.
In this episode of Spilling Secrets, Epstein Becker Green attorneys A. Millie Warner, James P. Flynn, Hemant Gupta, and Adelee Traylor dive into the key steps employers can take to maintain IP ownership, including using the right verb tense in employee IP provisions.
Visit our site for this week's Other Highlights and links: https://www.ebglaw.com/eltw331
Subscribe - https://www.ebglaw.com/subscribe/.
Visit http://www.EmploymentLawThisWeek.com.
This podcast is presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.