Employment Law This Week®: DOL’s Final Overtime Rule, CA Codifies “ABC Test,” Pay Data Collection Beyond 2018, NLRB’s Busy Summer

This Employment Law This Week Monthly Rundown discusses the most important developments for employers in October 2019. 

This episode includes: 

- DOL Issues Final Overtime Rule 

- California Codifies "ABC Test" for Classifying Workers 

- EEOC Reconsiders Pay Data Collection Beyond 2018 

- NLRB Wraps Up a Busy Summer 2019 

Featuring attorneys Paul DeCamp, RyAnn McKay Hooper, Robert J. O'Hara, and George Carroll Whipple, III, of Epstein Becker Green. 

For story details and other video formats, visit https://www.ebglaw.com/eltw145 

Stay tuned for further developments that may affect your business. 

Employment Law This Week – tracking the latest developments that could impact you and your workforce. The series features three components: Trending News, Deep Dives, and Monthly Rundowns. Follow us on LinkedIn, Facebook, YouTube, Instagram, and Twitter and subscribe for email notifications. 

The EMPLOYMENT LAW THIS WEEK® and THOUGHT LEADERS IN HEALTH LAW® podcasts are presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments.  Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments.  These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.