Supreme Court Roundup Fall Term

Today on Legalese we have my fall Supreme Court Roundup. Of the cases the Supreme Court has agreed to hear this upcoming term I have focused on 5 which I believe have a high likelihood of becoming landmark cases in constitutional law jurisprudence.

Including one case dealing with the Independent State Legislature Doctrine, based on Article I, Section 4, Clause 1 of the Constitution.

As well as two commerce clause cases, one dealing with the Indian Commerce Clause and another dealing with the dormant commerce clause as well as anti-commandeering doctrine under the tenth amendment.

Finally we have two cases regarding Section 230, the statute often referred to as the Internet's first amendment.

Moore v Harper – independent state legislature doctrine
Haaland v Brackeen – Indian Commerce Clause case
National Pork Producers Council v. Ross –Dormant Commerce Clause
Twitter, Inc. v. Taamneh – Section 230
Gonzalez v. Google LLC – section 230

Follow & Support

Show Homepage
Rumble
Odysee
YouTube
Anchor
Twitter
Substack

Legalese is community-supported venture that you can support with a one-time donation or monthly membership

PayPal.me
Venmo
Locals
Contact Me

Legalese is a podcast that discusses all things constitutional law and currents events in politics & other areas of law.

Tags: Law, Constitution, Politics, legal theory, Moral Philosophy, Current Events, supreme court, scotus, writ of cert, commerce, commerce clause, indian, dormant commerce clause, indian commerce clause, section 230, independent state legislature doctrine, state legislature, twitter, google, national pork producers, ross, moore v harper, haalan v braaken, haalan, braaken, voting rights, tenth amendment, anticomandeering doctrine, pike test, pike doctrine, anti-terrorism act, ATA, dormant

---

Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/legaleseshow/support