![Brennan Center LIVE artwork](https://is1-ssl.mzstatic.com/image/thumb/Podcasts123/v4/8f/4a/76/8f4a760f-e3b7-0031-627c-1c7d97d0364f/mza_7351049396439273817.png/100x100bb.jpg)
Madison's Music: On Reading the First Amendment
Brennan Center LIVE
English - March 31, 2015 20:48 - 56 minutes - 52 MB - ★★★★★ - 20 ratingsNews Government politics voting campaignfinance democracy justice law massincarceration privacy Homepage Download Apple Podcasts Google Podcasts Overcast Castro Pocket Casts RSS feed
Previous Episode: Democracy's Problems and Prospects: A Book Talk with Douglas E. Schoen
Next Episode: Government Secrecy and the Fourth Estate
What if most of what we think we know about reading the text of the First Amendment is just wrong? For years, the Supreme Court has treated the First Amendment like a laundry list of isolated words, stopping every once in a while to pull a couple of words out of the full text and claiming to be able to use the artificially isolated words as an infallible guide to what the First Amendment really means. In Madison's Music, Burt Neuborne argues that the Supreme Court has gotten the actual text wrong. If judges would only look at the First Amendment’s full text—all forty-five words—they would discover Madison’s music, a First Amendment that is democracy’s best friend.