How to read and review scientific papers

Blood & Cancer

English - February 21, 2019 09:00 - 20 minutes - 34.1 MB - ★★★★★ - 31 ratings
Medicine Health & Fitness Science Life Sciences oncologists radiotherapy cancer chemotherapy doctors healthcare hematologists hematology immunotherapy marrow Homepage Download Apple Podcasts Google Podcasts Overcast Castro Pocket Casts RSS feed

Previous Episode: ESMO 2018 and more

Next Episode: KATHERINE trial and breast cancer

Daniel G. Haller, MD, of the University of Pennsylvania joins David H. Henry, MD, to talk about the best ways to read and review the scientific literature.

And Ilana Rachel Yurkiewicz, MD, talks about chaos and opportunity.

Show notes
By Hitomi Hosoya, MD, PhD,
Resident in the department of internal medicine, University of Pennsylvania Health System

- If you are a peer reviewer of a manuscript submitted to a journal, you should be unbiased, consistent, constructive, and focused on the research. COPE guideline is a good resource.

- If you are a reader of a published article, it is important to ensure that the abstract has the same conclusion as the body of the article.

- If you are a clinical practitioner and wondering how to apply findings of published data, the editorial section is a good source.

- If you are a trainee and wondering how to stay up-to-date, Oxford Textbook of Oncology or ASCO University are recommended.

Reference: https://bit.ly/2xkGTcq