Paul Ray's Critique of the Expertise Rationale for Chevron Deference
Gray Matters
English - March 08, 2024 18:34 - 47 minutes - 43.3 MB - ★★★★★ - 5 ratingsNews arbitrary & capricious administrative law administrative state bureaucratic state adam j. white boyden gray antonin scalia law school george mason university Homepage Download Apple Podcasts Google Podcasts Overcast Castro Pocket Casts RSS feed
Previous Episode: Equity and the Administrative State
Next Episode: Federal Preemption and Environmental Regulation
Adam White and Jace Lington chat with former OIRA Administrator Paul J. Ray about his new paper, “Lover, Mystic, Bureaucrat, Judge: The Communication of Expertise and the Deference Doctrines.” In the paper, Mr. Ray critiques the expertise rationale for Chevron deference, arguing that agency employees can share much of the special knowledge they use to make decisions with reviewing courts.
Notes:
Lover, Mystic, Bureaucrat, Judge: The Communication of Expertise and the Deference Doctrines, Paul J. Ray Keynote Address and Fireside Chat, October 2023, Chevron on Trial: The Supreme Court and the Future of Agency Authority and Expertise